JD Howlette Law files unlawful discrimination lawsuit against U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Federal lawsuit alleges U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development unlawfully discriminated against Arab-American in federally-financed program.
Mr. Ak, a dedicated police officer and a Muslim male, sought to participate in HUD’s GNND Sales Program, a federal initiative that allows law enforcement officers, teachers, firefighters, and emergency medical technicians the opportunity to purchase homes at a 50% discount. According to the complaint, HUD initially allowed Mr. Ak to proceed with the purchase of a home under the GNND Sales Program, but then later rescinded the offer citing Mr. Ak’s alleged ineligibility under a specific regulation (i.e., 24 C.F.R. § 291.520(c)). But evidence obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request revealed that HUD allowed other officers to participate in the GNND Sales Program despite being ineligible under the same regulatory provision.
The complaint alleges that HUD engaged in selective enforcement that was motivated by an unconstitutional bias against Mr. Ak's Arabic or Muslin-sounding name, in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. The FOIA documents underscore Mr. Ak's position, showing that the other ineligible officers who HUD allowed to participate in the GNND Sales Program did not have Muslim-sounding names.
“This case underscores a blatant instance of discrimination through selective government enforcement, where a deserving individual was denied an opportunity that appears to be solely based on his ethnicity or national origin,” said Jordan D. Howlette, Managing Attorney at JD Howlette Law. “We are committed to ensuring that justice is served and that such discriminatory practices are eradicated, especially in the federal government.”
JD Howlette Law seeks a declaration that HUD’s enforcement of the specific regulation is unconstitutional as applied to Mr. Ak, and compensatory damages for the harm suffered by Mr. Ak as a result of HUD’s actions.
The case is Ak v. Fudge in the United States District of Maryland (Case No. 8:23-cv-02791-AAQ).
Jordan Howlette
JD Howlette Law
+1 202-921-6080
email us here
Visit us on social media:
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Instagram
Legal Disclaimer:
EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.