New book uses case studies and research to break down contentious theories and probe whether questions of morality and ethics can be answered by science

NEW YORK, USA, August 2, 2023/EINPresswire.com/ -- It’s becoming increasingly necessary to distinguish between genuine scientific sceptics and ‘dogmatic deniers’, a new book suggests.

This is one of many compelling observations made in Keith M. Parsons’ new book, Why It’s OK to Trust Science.

“Scepticism is essential to science. New ideas, however beautiful or brilliant, must be subjected to the most rigorous vetting that scientific communities can dish out,” outlines the Professor of Philosophy and Humanities.

“Scepticism, by definition, is defeasible. That is, when confronted with sufficient evidence, a sceptic will – provisionally – accept the well-confirmed claim.”

In the 1990s, academic disputes about the role, authority and status of science grew so passionate and embittered, they came to be known as “the science wars.”

He notes: “The upshot of these critiques [made by radical feminists, sociologists of knowledge, and postmodernist theorists] was that science is a social construct, an excrescence of politics, white male privilege, rhetoric, intimidation, and subterfuge. Defenders of science replied with vigorous, often trenchant arguments.”

Almost 30 years later, Parsons believes that it is vital to examine the issues at the heart of the controversy, many of which remain relevant today.

The emergence of COVID – and its ongoing impact – and the increasing global calls for sustainability and reduced fossil fuel emissions in the face of a warming climate, have firmly fixed anti-vaccination proponents and climate change deniers within public discourse.

Parsons identifies philosophical relativist theory at the heart of much science critique – the claim that what is true for one individual or social group or may not be true for another. Relativist thinkers argue that truth is, instead, relative to culture, theory or conceptual scheme.

The book considers different arguments associated with relativism, like the “holism thesis” – the claim that any theory can be made compatible with any evidence by appropriate adjustments in our other beliefs – before decisively rebutting them.

“Most obviously, scientific methods are designed to severely restrict the “wiggle room” in the interpretation of experimental results and focus upon specific hypotheses as the reason for the failure or success of prediction,” explains Parsons.

“Further, and equally importantly, theories must jump through many hoops before they even become acceptable candidates for testing vis-à-vis the evidence.”

Why It’s OK to Trust Science compellingly puts forth the case that science generates objective knowledge, which can be gained even when engaging complex, timely, and even divisive, issues.

Using the climate issue as an example, Parsons deploys scientific research in order to sift through what is necessary scepticism and what is merely “pseudo-scepticism”. He calls attention to the different features that set the types of critics apart, such as the type of data they cite.

He says: “Pseudo-sceptics continue to cite data and research after they are out of date – sometimes long out of date. They are also adept at cherry-picking data, that is, citing only data selected to support a favoured conclusion.”

As issues like global warming become ever more urgent, the ability to discern between the different forms of scientific critique becomes equally so. Why It’s OK to Trust Science urges readers – within and beyond the scientific community – to examine their own understanding of the field and be willing to have their opinions cemented, demystified or even debunked.

Further information:

Why It’s OK to Trust Science, by Keith M. Parsons (Routledge, 2023)
ISBN: Paperback: 9780367616410 | Hardback: 9780367616403 | eBook: 9781003105817 |
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003105817   
  
About the author:  
Keith M. Parsons is Professor of Philosophy and Humanities, Emeritus at The University of Houston-Clear Lake. His books include God and the Burden of Proof (1989), Drawing Out Leviathan: Dinosaurs and the Science Wars (2001), and Bombing the Marshall Islands: A Cold War Tragedy (2017; coauthored with Robert A. Zaballa).

Taylor & Francis contact:    
Becky Parker-Ellis, Media Relations Manager    
Email: newsroom@taylorandfrancis.com     
Tel.: +(44) 7818 911310   
Follow us on Twitter: @tandfnewsroom        
    
About Taylor & Francis Group    
Taylor & Francis supports diverse communities of experts, researchers and knowledge makers around the world to accelerate and maximize the impact of their work. We are a leader in our field, publish across all disciplines and have one of the largest Humanities and Social Sciences portfolios. Our expertise, built on an academic publishing heritage of over 200 years, advances trusted knowledge that fosters human progress.  
  
Our 2650 people, based in a global network of offices in 17 countries, use their skills and the latest technology to curate, validate and share impactful advanced, emergent and applied knowledge. Under the Taylor & Francis, Routledge and F1000 imprints we publish 2700 journals, 8000 new books each year and partner with more than 700 scholarly societies.   
  
Taylor & Francis is proud to be a Global Certified Accessible™ publisher and to have achieved CarbonNeutral^® certification for our operations and print publications in accordance with The CarbonNeutral Protocol.  
  
   
***** ENDS *****    

Rebecca Parker-Ellis
Taylor & Francis
+44 7818 911310
email us here

Legal Disclaimer:

EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.