SCOTUS will not review Supreme Court’s pro-consumer Holder Rule opinion
The Supreme Court last May held in Pulliam v. HNL Automotive Inc. (2022) 13 Cal.5th 127 that a Federal Trade Commission rule allowing a consumer to sue not only the seller of defective goods but also the third-party holder of a credit contract on the sale does not prevent the consumer from getting attorney fees from the creditor. The court held that a limit written into the so-called Holder Rule doesn’t negate an attorney fees provision in California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, commonly known as the “lemon law.”
Legal Disclaimer:
EIN Presswire provides this news content "as is" without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
